IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i3ne70030.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empowering Female Managers: A Cross‐Sector Comparison of Perceived Inclusion and Internal Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Jiwon Suh
  • Jihoon Jeong
  • Eunsil Yoo

Abstract

Objective Organizational inclusion is essential for female employees who consistently encounter challenges while advancing workplace hierarchies, but its roles have partially been explored. The objective of this study is to empirically examine the effects of internal networks on perceived inclusion and test the degree to which these networks impact self‐competency via perceived inclusion. Methods Leveraging a wave of 2018 data from the Korean Women Manager Panel, we test several hypotheses and compare the for‐profit and public sectors using structural equation modeling. Results The findings show that perceived inclusion is essential in directly influencing female employees’ self‐competency and offsetting the negative impacts of interpersonal and group networks on self‐competency in the for‐profit sector. However, the effects are either marginal or absent in the public sector. Our analysis finds that only vertical interpersonal relationships with superiors and mentors indirectly impact self‐competency. Conclusion This study suggests that the role of perceived inclusion may vary depending on the sector, and vertical relationships are more critical for female public employees to enhance their competencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiwon Suh & Jihoon Jeong & Eunsil Yoo, 2025. "Empowering Female Managers: A Cross‐Sector Comparison of Perceived Inclusion and Internal Networks," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(3), May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:3:n:e70030
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70030
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:3:n:e70030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.