IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i3ne70027.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Party Time: The Effect of Partisan and Nonpartisan Media Messages on Support for Packing the US Supreme Court

Author

Listed:
  • Anna McCaghren Fleming
  • Matthew D. Montgomery
  • Natalie C. Rogol

Abstract

Objective This study assessed how different types of framed media messages—nonpartisan, partisan, and mixed—affect public support for Supreme Court reform, specifically the proposal to add justices to the bench (Court packing). Methods We conducted a pre‐registered survey experiment with approximately 1500 respondents recruited via Prolific. Participants were randomly assigned to one of seven conditions, including a control, nonpartisan‐only, partisan‐only, or combined frames, all presented in the format of brief news articles. We measured respondents’ support for Court packing and analyzed treatment effects using OLS regression. Results Anti‐Court packing messages consistently reduced support for reform, regardless of partisanship. Pro‐reform messages—especially partisan ones—were largely ineffective at increasing support for Court packing. Nevertheless, partisan framed messages moved respondents in ideologically congenial ways compared to the effects of nonpartisan messages. Conclusion In a polarized media environment, anti‐reform messages are more persuasive than pro‐reform ones, and out‐party cues are more powerful than messages tapping universally shared values. These findings suggest that partisan identity strongly conditions how citizens respond to messaging about institutional reform.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna McCaghren Fleming & Matthew D. Montgomery & Natalie C. Rogol, 2025. "Party Time: The Effect of Partisan and Nonpartisan Media Messages on Support for Packing the US Supreme Court," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(3), May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:3:n:e70027
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70027
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:3:n:e70027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.