IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i3ne70025.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Ranked‐Choice Voting Associated With Turnout Across Race/Ethnic Groups?

Author

Listed:
  • E. Dowling
  • Caroline Tolbert
  • Nathan Micatka
  • Todd Donovan

Abstract

Objective Research suggests ranked‐choice voting (RCV) may increase the pool of candidates in local races and create incentives for campaign contacting which could increase voter turnout. Research also documents people of color may have lower levels of engagement with RCV. We examine how RCV is associated with turnout for communities of color and whether RCV widens participation gaps for racial groups. Methods We use voter file data combined with commercial data (Catalist) to compare turnout in local odd‐year elections across the United States in places that use RCV and in those that do not, and compare turnout within Minnesota cities. Results We find RCV places are not associated with lower turnout among people of color. If anything, the results suggest people from various race/ethnic groups examined here had higher rates of turnout in RCV cities than these groups had in other places, with greater turnout proportionately highest among Whites. Conclusion We conclude with caveats about the results and note a normative question these results might raise.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Dowling & Caroline Tolbert & Nathan Micatka & Todd Donovan, 2025. "Is Ranked‐Choice Voting Associated With Turnout Across Race/Ethnic Groups?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(3), May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:3:n:e70025
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70025
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:3:n:e70025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.