IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i3ne70021.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who's to Blame? How Recipient Deservingness Influences Attitudes About Access to the Organ Transplants

Author

Listed:
  • Steven M. Sylvester
  • Simon F. Haeder

Abstract

Objective The United States continues to experience a severe shortage of organs available for transplant. Do Americans differentiate between who should and should not get an organ transplant based on the extent to which their situation might be attributed to internal or external factors? And how do race and ethnicity affect these attitudes? Methods We surveyed 4177 Americans from March 18 to April 18, 2022, to explore this issue. The survey contained a vignette‐based experiment that introduced respondents to individuals with four distinct life circumstances. We also relied on racially/ethnically identifiable names. We relied on comparisons of predicted means to assess differences. Results We found that public attitudes are shaped by assessments of the life circumstances of potential transplant recipients, with important nuances for various subgroups. We generally did not find any differentiation based on the race/ethnicity of the vignette. Conclusion More work is needed to assess whether and how public attitudes should be included in decisions about transplant allocation.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven M. Sylvester & Simon F. Haeder, 2025. "Who's to Blame? How Recipient Deservingness Influences Attitudes About Access to the Organ Transplants," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(3), May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:3:n:e70021
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70021
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:3:n:e70021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.