IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i3ne70018.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The More The Worse: Effects of Childcare Burdens on Parents’ Pro‐Environmental Attitudes

Author

Listed:
  • Chan‐Song Kim
  • Gi‐Woo Roh

Abstract

Objectives We examine how parenthood shapes pro‐environmental attitudes. In particular, we discuss the dual pressure of legacy motivations and childcare burdens, gender disparities in caregiving responsibilities, and financial constraints on parents’ capacity to engage with environmental concerns. Methods We utilize the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES) from 2016, 2018, and 2020. The dependent variable is the pro‐environmental attitude score, and the key independent variables include parenthood, the number of children, gender, and income. The ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions are fitted to examine the main effects as well as the interactive effects. Results Our analysis shows that the effect of the number of children on pro‐environmental attitudes is conditional upon gender and income. Fathers and high‐income parents initially show greater support for pro‐environmental policies when they have fewer children as compared to when they have no children. However, as family size grows, their support for pro‐environmental policies declines. On the other hand, mothers and low‐income parents experience monotonically decreasing support for pro‐environmental policies as they have more children. Conclusions Our analysis suggests that legacy motivations prevail at first, helping parents to have higher pro‐environmental support. But, as childcare burdens intensify, they dominate legacy motivations and lower pro‐environmental support.

Suggested Citation

  • Chan‐Song Kim & Gi‐Woo Roh, 2025. "The More The Worse: Effects of Childcare Burdens on Parents’ Pro‐Environmental Attitudes," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(3), May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:3:n:e70018
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70018
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:3:n:e70018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.