IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i3ne70017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Climate Concern and Americans’ Ideal Number of Children: The Moderating Role of Religious Involvement

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel L. Perry

Abstract

Objective It is a growing narrative that some Americans want fewer ono children because of climate change concerns. Yet Americans’ childbearing views and intentions remain powerfully influenced by their involvement with religion. I theorize children figure into different schemas of social problem‐solving for secular and religious communities and thus religious involvement will moderate any link between Americans’ climate concerns and childbearing ideals. Methods Focusing on Americans of childbearing age in the 2021 General Social Survey, I estimate regression models predicting the ideal number of children with interaction terms for climate change concern, religious involvement, and parental status. Results In the main effects, climate concern is not significantly associated with Americans’ ideal number of children. However, among Americans who rarely attend worship, climate concern is negatively associated with their ideal number of children. In contrast, Americans who attend worship at least monthly report a higher ideal number of children as climate concern increases. Triple interactions further reveal this pattern applies to childless Americans specifically. Ancillary analyses show similar moderating patterns for religion measures like prayer frequency and religious importance. Conclusions I discuss the implications of these findings for understanding how climate concern shapes Americans’ thoughts about childbearing within the context of growing secularization.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel L. Perry, 2025. "Climate Concern and Americans’ Ideal Number of Children: The Moderating Role of Religious Involvement," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(3), May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:3:n:e70017
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70017
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:3:n:e70017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.