IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i3ne70016.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gun Ownership: The Bridge Between Rural and Urban Voters in 2020

Author

Listed:
  • Mark R. Joslyn

Abstract

Objective This article examines whether gun ownership can mitigate the impact of place‐based identities on voter choice. Methods The analysis is conducted using 2020 American National Election Studies data. Multivariate logistic regressions investigate the direct effects of gun ownership, place of residence—rural to urban, and the interaction between the two variables on voter choice. Results As in previous studies, the main effects of gun ownership and place of residence are significant predictors of voter choice. Importantly, their interaction shows that gun ownership is sufficiently robust to bridge the rural–urban divide, thereby connecting voters with fundamentally different lived experiences. Gun owners in rural areas and large cities alike preferred Trump to Biden by wide margins. Conclusion Results stand in sharp contrast to the standard narratives about guns that emphasize division and polarization. Rather, in 2020, gun ownership overcame substantial geographical divisions in voter choice and cultivated a shared political preference.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark R. Joslyn, 2025. "Gun Ownership: The Bridge Between Rural and Urban Voters in 2020," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(3), May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:3:n:e70016
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70016
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:3:n:e70016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.