IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i2ne70009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Candidate List Position on Vote Share: Improving Internal Validity and Expanding Scope Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Kentaro Fukumoto

Abstract

Objective When a candidate occupies a favorable position on a ballot, such as the top, they tend to secure a larger share of votes. Nonetheless, identifying position effects is challenging unless these positions are determined exogenously. I intend to improve the internal validity and expand the scope conditions of position effects analyses. Method The Japanese House of Councilors election offers an ideal natural experiment for internal validity because candidate positions are randomized across municipalities. Moreover, this case expands the scope conditions of position effects because (1) candidate names are displayed not on a ballot but on a list at the voting booth; (2) voters read the list from right to left and from top to bottom, thus making the top‐right corner, rather than the top‐left corner, the best position; and (3) the electoral system is a single nontransferable vote system, which has not yet been studied. Results When a candidate is located at the top‐right corner, the vote share is 0.560 percentage points greater than when they are located in another position. I cannot confirm other position effects. Conclusion The results suggest the primacy effect, namely, that the top position increases a candidate's vote share in Japan.

Suggested Citation

  • Kentaro Fukumoto, 2025. "The Effect of Candidate List Position on Vote Share: Improving Internal Validity and Expanding Scope Conditions," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(2), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:2:n:e70009
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70009
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:2:n:e70009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.