IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i2ne70003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Luxury Brands and the Ideal Victim Paradox: Moderating Role of Social Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Eunmi Jeon
  • Jaisang Jay Kim

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of luxury brand prominence on victims on the intention to help, considering the influence of perceived victim credibility and the moderating effect of social comparison tendency. Methods Through two online studies, participants were exposed to scenarios where victims were either associated with luxury brands or not. Study 1 tested the direct effect of luxury brand prominence on the intention to help, while Study 2 delved into the indirect effect through perceived incredibility and examined the influence of social comparison. Results Results indicated that the prominence of luxury brands significantly reduced the intention to help, primarily due to enhanced perceptions of victim incredibility. Furthermore, this effect was amplified in individuals with high levels of social comparison tendency. Conclusions Luxury brand visibility can adversely affect the intention to help, with perceived credibility and social comparison playing the moderating role in this process. This underscores the need to consider societal and psychological factors in understanding responses to victims in distress.

Suggested Citation

  • Eunmi Jeon & Jaisang Jay Kim, 2025. "Luxury Brands and the Ideal Victim Paradox: Moderating Role of Social Comparison," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(2), March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:2:n:e70003
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70003
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:2:n:e70003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.