IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v103y2022i5p1140-1154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Politics or need? Explaining state protective measures in the coronavirus pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Martin K. Mayer
  • John C. Morris
  • Ryan D. Williamson
  • Jan C. Hume
  • Steven P. McKnight
  • Nurun Naher
  • Sindhu Weber
  • Xiaodan Zhang

Abstract

Objective We explain evolving policy choices made by all 50 states in response to the coronavirus (COVID‐19) pandemic in the United States against the background of each state's political and public health landscape. Method We create an index of eight state preventative measures and explain variation in that index by infection and death rates, vaccination rates, support for President Trump in 2020, and the political party of the governor. We control for population density and the health vulnerability of each state. Results State response was largely driven by three factors: the death rate from COVID‐19, Trump votes in 2020 and Republican control of the governorship. Conclusion Understanding state response to the pandemic requires going beyond a partisan lens and considering the shifting onus of responsibility for taking action to protect against the virus from states to individual citizens in an increasingly politicized sphere of pandemic response.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin K. Mayer & John C. Morris & Ryan D. Williamson & Jan C. Hume & Steven P. McKnight & Nurun Naher & Sindhu Weber & Xiaodan Zhang, 2022. "Politics or need? Explaining state protective measures in the coronavirus pandemic," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(5), pages 1140-1154, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:103:y:2022:i:5:p:1140-1154
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13187
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13187?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:103:y:2022:i:5:p:1140-1154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.