IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v103y2022i2p306-316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Post‐election stress disorder?” Examining the increased stress of sexual harassment survivors after the 2016 election

Author

Listed:
  • Christina Fattore
  • Xiaohui Zhao
  • Kimberly M. Kelly
  • Pamela J. Murray
  • Karen Weiss
  • Jayeshkumar Patel
  • Kim Innes
  • Usha Sambamoorthi
  • Ranjita Misra

Abstract

Objectives In this paper, we explore if Donald Trump's electoral success in 2016 led to heightened levels of stress for sexual harassment survivors. Methods Logistic regression models predicting voter stress using original survey data collected in the weeks following the 2016 election were utilized. Results We find that women survivors of sexual harassment experienced elevated stres when compared to women who were never harassed. Conclusion Female survivors of sexual harassment may be concerned that their well‐being was under attack due to the triumph of hostile sexism.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina Fattore & Xiaohui Zhao & Kimberly M. Kelly & Pamela J. Murray & Karen Weiss & Jayeshkumar Patel & Kim Innes & Usha Sambamoorthi & Ranjita Misra, 2022. "“Post‐election stress disorder?” Examining the increased stress of sexual harassment survivors after the 2016 election," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(2), pages 306-316, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:103:y:2022:i:2:p:306-316
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13114
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13114?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:103:y:2022:i:2:p:306-316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.