IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v102y2021i7p3142-3148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Looking in a mirror: Asylum in the United States as a reflection of white supremacy

Author

Listed:
  • Adriano Udani
  • Maria Torres Wedding

Abstract

Objective We contend that the asylum process in the United States exhibits how confinement, surveillance, and deportation work together to extend the primary logics of white supremacy: genocide, anti‐blackness, and orientalism. We envision abolition work that uplifts not only asylum seekers but all people with lived experiences of coerced mobility. Methods Through the lenses of critical race, decolonial theory, and abolition, we conceptualize the asylum process beyond only one violent system that coerces the mobility of migrants. Results We build a theory that extends scholarly conversations about asylum processes as a system of racial/colonial surveillance, control, and state‐sanctioned violence and that informs abolitionist practices. Conclusion In order to eradicate all forms of detention, we must build robust strategies that demolish the pillars of white supremacy and rebuild new politics that reject the notion of freedom as a reward to well‐behaved people, resist coerced mobility, foster shared power arrangements in which people with lived experiences of oppression organize to help each other, and reorient a capitalist system that commoditizes and exploits people's oppression. Striving for anything less will lead to more violence.

Suggested Citation

  • Adriano Udani & Maria Torres Wedding, 2021. "Looking in a mirror: Asylum in the United States as a reflection of white supremacy," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(7), pages 3142-3148, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:7:p:3142-3148
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13088
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13088?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:7:p:3142-3148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.