IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v102y2021i7p3081-3086.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Whose democracy in which state?: Abolition democracy from Angela Davis to W. E. B. Du Bois

Author

Listed:
  • Quinn Lester

Abstract

Objective This article argues that a better understanding of the history and reception of W. E. B. Du Bois's abolition democracy helps elucidate contemporary debates by abolitionists about how to engage with the state. Methods Through a close reading of Du Bois's Black Reconstruction I show how contemporary focus on abolition as abolishing the carceral state and building alternatives elides viewing abolition democracy as an engagement with and challenge to state power. Results Viewing abolition democracy from this longer history allows scholars today to view debates among abolitionists themselves as a conflict between transforming how the state work and carving out autonomous spaces of freedom away from the state. Conclusion By recognizing the confliced history between Du Bois's use of abolition democracy and its invocation by contemporary activists, I show how abolition itself is a fundamentally contested concept deployed for multiple political discourses and struggles.

Suggested Citation

  • Quinn Lester, 2021. "Whose democracy in which state?: Abolition democracy from Angela Davis to W. E. B. Du Bois," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(7), pages 3081-3086, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:7:p:3081-3086
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13019
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:7:p:3081-3086. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.