IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v102y2021i4p1361-1379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The “costs” of voting: The effects of vote‐by‐mail on election administration finance in Colorado

Author

Listed:
  • Matt Lamb

Abstract

Objective In this article,I ask whether the adoption of vote‐by‐mail (VBM) has resulted in the promised cost reductions. Additionally, I examine the overall determinants of election administration expenditures after the implementation of VBM. Methods Using Colorado as a case study, I use county level expenditures to determine the effects of institutional change on election administration finance, as well as other institutional and socio‐demographic determinants on costs. Results I find that adopting all‐VBM elections significantly reduced expenditures. Additionally, I find that after VBM was implemented, the primary institutional determinants of expenditures are the proportion of mail‐in ballots received, as well as the number of poll‐workers, and early voting sites. Finally, I find that socio‐demographic characteristics are predictive of expenditures for election administration. Counties with higher income spent less per voter in federal elections. Counties with higher proportions of Latinx voting‐aged populations spent less per voter, even when controlling for turnout. Conclusion The results strongly indicate that moving to all‐VBM elections can help cash‐strapped counties save money. However, conversion to VBM may not guarantee that expenditures will be spent equitably.

Suggested Citation

  • Matt Lamb, 2021. "The “costs” of voting: The effects of vote‐by‐mail on election administration finance in Colorado," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(4), pages 1361-1379, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:4:p:1361-1379
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13012
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zachary Mohr & JoEllen V. Pope & Martha E. Kropf & Mary Jo Shepherd, 2019. "Strategic Spending: Does Politics Influence Election Administration Expenditure?," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(2), pages 427-438, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michelle L. Lofton & Mikhail Ivonchyk, 2022. "Financial manager professionalism and use of interfund transfers: Evidence from Georgia counties," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 171-195, June.
    2. Markie McBrayer & R. Lucas Williams & Andrea Eckelman, 2020. "Local Officials as Partisan Operatives: The Effect of County Officials on Early Voting Administration," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(4), pages 1475-1488, July.
    3. Mary Jo McGowan & JoEllen V. Pope & Martha E. Kropf & Zachary Mohr, 2021. "Guns or Butter… or Elections? Understanding intertemporal and distributive dimensions of policy choice through the examination of budgetary tradeoffs at the local level," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 3-19, December.
    4. Apoorva Lal & Daniel M Thompson, 2023. "Did Private Election Administration Funding Advantage Democrats in 2020?," Papers 2310.05275, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:4:p:1361-1379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.