IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v101y2020i2p989-1003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Group Presence, Population, and Interest Group Theory: A Case Study of the American Anti‐Slavery Society

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Chamberlain

Abstract

Objective This study seeks to learn about the development of large, federated voluntary associations in the antebellum era by combining insights from historical work and neopluralist interest group theory. The American Anti‐Slavery Society (AASS) is the case study. Methods Summary statistics and logistic regression models are used to investigate what variables predict the presence of an AASS local group in a town. Results Total population of a town is the key predictor of AASS group presence across states, though the percentage of people employed in learned professions and the number of primary common schools per capita are also important in select states. Conclusion Population itself was the modernizing force behind group formation in the antebellum era, creating contexts conducive to the mobilization of interests.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Chamberlain, 2020. "Group Presence, Population, and Interest Group Theory: A Case Study of the American Anti‐Slavery Society," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(2), pages 989-1003, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:2:p:989-1003
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12781
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12781?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:2:p:989-1003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.