IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v101y2020i2p861-877.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Candidate Extremism and Electoral Design in U.S. State Legislative Elections

Author

Listed:
  • Isaac Hale

Abstract

Objective This study examines the association between the electoral systems used in U.S. state legislative elections and candidate ideological dispersion. Previous work suggests that, under certain conditions, greater district magnitude has a centrifugal polarizing effect on candidate ideology. Cross‐national investigations of this theory have produced conflicting results. Methods Building on this body of research, this paper leverages electoral system variation in U.S. state legislative elections to evaluate whether district‐level electoral system variation influences candidate ideology. Results We find strong evidence for a polarizing relationship between district magnitude on candidate ideology, even under plurality voting. Conclusion This paper has significant implications for our understanding of candidate ideological positioning in sub‐national contexts as well of how electoral systems affect the quality of representation voters receive from legislators.

Suggested Citation

  • Isaac Hale, 2020. "Candidate Extremism and Electoral Design in U.S. State Legislative Elections," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(2), pages 861-877, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:2:p:861-877
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12749
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12749?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:2:p:861-877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.