IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v101y2020i2p825-841.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Personalizing the U.S. Supreme Court Through Attention to Individual Justices

Author

Listed:
  • Brian J. Fogarty
  • S. Nasser Qadri
  • Patrick C. Wohlfarth

Abstract

Objectives We examine media incentives shaping the nature of U.S. Supreme Court justices’ news coverage and, in particular, how those incentives often lead news outlets to concentrate coverage on particular justices on the Court. Methods First, we examine and model aggregate, over time patterns of news attention devoted to individual justices in the New York Times over the past four decades. Second, we compare and model temporal variation in individual justice coverage relative to generic coverage of the Supreme Court. Findings The results suggest that particular justices receive disproportionate attention from the national news media. Further, we demonstrate how individual justices have received a greater proportion of print media coverage over time and in a way that is shaped by internal division among the justices. Conclusion The findings provide a more complete and nuanced understanding of how national media utilize resources to maximize journalistic impact and personalize the Court as an institution.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian J. Fogarty & S. Nasser Qadri & Patrick C. Wohlfarth, 2020. "Personalizing the U.S. Supreme Court Through Attention to Individual Justices," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(2), pages 825-841, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:2:p:825-841
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12771
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12771?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:2:p:825-841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.