IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v101y2020i2p558-572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing Broken Windows Theory in Mexico City

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos J. Vilalta
  • Pablo Lopez
  • Gustavo Fondevila
  • Oscar Siordia

Abstract

Objectives To test the broken windows theory in the Mexican context. Methods Publicly available homicide counts and census data at the neighborhood level were used. Broken windows theory was operationalized through the use of social disorder and physical disorder measures. Measures were both calculated using PCA. For data analysis, we employed four multilevel random intercept models to relate homicide counts to our broken windows components. Results The social disorder and physical disorder components cannot be seen as operating independently from each other. In addition, the negative interaction term between the two components suggests that the combined impact of social disorder and physical disorder is less than the independent effects, and that the impact of social disorder diminishes as neighborhoods become less physically disordered and vice versa. Conclusion Findings demonstrate the validity of broken windows theory across countries and offer new ideas to support crime prevention policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos J. Vilalta & Pablo Lopez & Gustavo Fondevila & Oscar Siordia, 2020. "Testing Broken Windows Theory in Mexico City," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(2), pages 558-572, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:2:p:558-572
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12760
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12760
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12760?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:2:p:558-572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.