IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v101y2020i1p107-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dehumanization of the Opposition in Political Campaigns

Author

Listed:
  • Erin C. Cassese

Abstract

Objective This article documents dehumanization in the 2016 presidential contest. Methods Using a mixed‐method approach, I analyze dehumanized portrayals of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in visual campaign rhetoric and on common survey measures of dehumanization. Results Images from the campaign discourse reflect animalistic and mechanistic dehumanization of the presidential candidates. The survey data reveal that voters dehumanize opposition candidates and party members in both subtle and blatant ways that also reflect this animalistic–mechanistic distinction. Conclusion The findings affirm the external validity of measurement strategies for dehumanization by showing the correspondence between campaign imagery and common survey‐based measurement tools. This work situates dehumanization as a psychological process relevant to the study of campaigns and elections.

Suggested Citation

  • Erin C. Cassese, 2020. "Dehumanization of the Opposition in Political Campaigns," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(1), pages 107-120, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:1:p:107-120
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12745
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12745?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:1:p:107-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.