IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v100y2019i6p2369-2390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Different Immigrants, Same Attitudes? Making Sense of the Association Between Two Immigrant Groups

Author

Listed:
  • Tsung‐han Tsai
  • Chia‐hung Tsai
  • Chi Huang

Abstract

Objective Previous studies of public attitudes toward immigration have been set in economically developed areas such as the United States and the countries of Western Europe, implicitly applying the term “immigrants” solely to blue‐collar laborers. In this article, we extend the discussion to Taiwan, a newly democratic and nearly developed country in East Asia. Methods Our study investigates public attitudes toward immigrants with different occupations and test predictions derived from both economic and cultural approaches. Results From an analysis of the survey data, we find different economic factors for pro‐immigration attitudes toward foreign professionals and laborers. Conclusions Specifically, people who have higher incomes are more likely to allow foreign professionals to become citizens, and people with positive assessments of national and individual economic conditions are more likely to favor the inflow of foreign workers. Furthermore, cultural tolerance and a high level of education are correlated to pro‐migration attitudes toward both foreign professionals and laborers.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsung‐han Tsai & Chia‐hung Tsai & Chi Huang, 2019. "Different Immigrants, Same Attitudes? Making Sense of the Association Between Two Immigrant Groups," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 100(6), pages 2369-2390, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:100:y:2019:i:6:p:2369-2390
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12706
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12706?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:100:y:2019:i:6:p:2369-2390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.