IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v100y2019i4p1009-1022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political Protesting, Race, and College Athletics: Why Diversity Among Coaches Matters

Author

Listed:
  • James N. Druckman
  • Adam J. Howat
  • Jacob E. Rothschild

Abstract

Objective Athletes have long used their platform to stage political protests on issues ranging from racial oppression to athlete compensation. For college student athletes, protesting is complicated by their amateur status and dependence on their schools. As a result, college coaches hold particular power over student athletes’ decisions in this realm. We seek to better understand the determinants of coaches’ attitudes toward student athlete protests. Methods We use a novel survey to study what college coaches think when student athletes participate in various forms of political protests. Results We find that African‐American coaches exhibit greater support for protests and are more likely to believe protests reflect concern about the issues, rather than attention‐seeking behavior. Conclusion Our results isolate a major driver of opinions about athletic protests and reveal why the relatively low number of minority college coaches matters: greater diversity in the coaching ranks would lead to more varied opinions about the politicization of student athletes.

Suggested Citation

  • James N. Druckman & Adam J. Howat & Jacob E. Rothschild, 2019. "Political Protesting, Race, and College Athletics: Why Diversity Among Coaches Matters," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 100(4), pages 1009-1022, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:100:y:2019:i:4:p:1009-1022
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12615
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12615?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:100:y:2019:i:4:p:1009-1022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.