IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v100y2019i3p689-700.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Big Five and Southern Legislative Distinctiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Joel F. Turner
  • Jeffrey P. Kash
  • Scott Lasley

Abstract

Objective Previous research has found that southern state legislators demonstrate more progressive ambition than their nonsouthern counterparts. This presents an interesting puzzle with regard to why this difference exists. In this article, we apply the Five‐Factor Model (conscientiousness, agreeableness, neuroticism, openness, and extraversion) to investigate whether regional personality differences exist that can help explain why southern legislators exhibit greater levels of progressive ambition than nonsouthern legislators. Methods Data from a national survey of state legislator are analyzed using ordinal regression. Results Our findings show that higher levels of extraversion and openness among the legislators are directly related to greater levels of political ambition. More specifically, southern legislators appear to possess disproportionately higher levels of extraversion and openness than their nonsouthern counterparts. This helps explain the greater levels of progressive ambition they express. Conclusions In addition to providing insight into progressive ambition, the results reinforce the notion of southern distinctiveness among state legislatures.

Suggested Citation

  • Joel F. Turner & Jeffrey P. Kash & Scott Lasley, 2019. "The Big Five and Southern Legislative Distinctiveness," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 100(3), pages 689-700, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:100:y:2019:i:3:p:689-700
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12581
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12581?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:100:y:2019:i:3:p:689-700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.