IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/scjsta/v53y2026i2p821-847.html

Testing independence between high‐dimensional random vectors using rank‐based max‐sum tests

Author

Listed:
  • Hongfei Wang
  • Binghui Liu
  • Long Feng

Abstract

In this paper, we address the problem of testing independence between two high‐dimensional random vectors. Our approach involves a series of max‐sum tests based on three well‐known classes of rank‐based correlations. These correlation classes encompass several popular rank measures, including Spearman's ρ$$ \rho $$, Kendall's τ$$ \tau $$, Hoeffding's D, Blum‐Kiefer‐Rosenblatt's R, and Bergsma‐Dassios‐Yanagimoto's τ∗$$ {\tau}^{\ast } $$. The key advantages of our proposed tests are threefold: (1) they do not rely on specific assumptions about the distribution of random vectors, which makes them applicable across a wide range of settings; (2) they can effectively capture nonlinear dependence structures between random vectors, a critical aspect in high‐dimensional contexts; (3) they exhibit robust power performance under both sparse and dense alternatives. Notably, our proposed tests exhibit robust power across a variety of scenarios, as evidenced by extensive numerical results and an empirical application to RNA microarray data.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongfei Wang & Binghui Liu & Long Feng, 2026. "Testing independence between high‐dimensional random vectors using rank‐based max‐sum tests," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 53(2), pages 821-847, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:53:y:2026:i:2:p:821-847
    DOI: 10.1111/sjos.70063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjos.70063
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/sjos.70063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:53:y:2026:i:2:p:821-847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0303-6898 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.