Author
Listed:
- Emily Berg
- Sixia Chen
- Cindy Yu
Abstract
Non‐probability samples are prevalent in various fields, such as biomedical studies, educational research, and business investigations, owing to the escalating challenges associated with declining response rates and the cost‐effectiveness and convenience of utilizing such samples. However, relying on naive estimates derived from non‐probability samples, without adequate adjustments, may introduce bias into study outcomes. Addressing this concern, data integration methodologies, which amalgamate information from both probability and non‐probability samples, have demonstrated effectiveness in mitigating selection bias. Nonetheless, the efficacy of these methods hinges upon the assumptions underlying the models. This paper introduces innovative and robust data integration approaches, notably a semi‐parametric quantile regression‐based mass‐imputation (Mass‐Imp.) approach and a doubly‐robust approach that integrates a nonparametric estimator of the participation probability for non‐probability samples. Our proposed methodologies exhibit greater robustness compared to existing parametric approaches, particularly concerning model misspecification and outliers. Theoretical results are established, including variance estimators for our proposed estimators. Through comprehensive simulation studies and real‐world applications, our findings demonstrate the promising performance of the proposed estimators in facilitating valid statistical inference. This research contributes to the advancement of robust methodologies for handling non‐probability samples, thereby enhancing the reliability and validity of research outcomes across diverse domains.
Suggested Citation
Emily Berg & Sixia Chen & Cindy Yu, 2025.
"Combining probability and non‐probability samples using semi‐parametric quantile regression and a nonparametric estimator of the participation probability,"
Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 52(4), pages 2128-2151, December.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:52:y:2025:i:4:p:2128-2151
DOI: 10.1111/sjos.70020
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:52:y:2025:i:4:p:2128-2151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0303-6898 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.