IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/scjsta/v44y2017i2p285-306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exact Goodness-of-Fit Testing for the Ising Model

Author

Listed:
  • Abraham Martín del Campo
  • Sarah Cepeda
  • Caroline Uhler

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Abraham Martín del Campo & Sarah Cepeda & Caroline Uhler, 2017. "Exact Goodness-of-Fit Testing for the Ising Model," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(2), pages 285-306, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:44:y:2017:i:2:p:285-306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/sjos.12251
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giovanni Pistone & Maria Rogantin, 2013. "The algebra of reversible Markov chains," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 65(2), pages 269-293, April.
    2. Fabio Rapallo, 2003. "Algebraic Markov Bases and MCMC for Two‐Way Contingency Tables," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 30(2), pages 385-397, June.
    3. Fabio Rapallo & Ruriko Yoshida, 2010. "Markov bases and subbases for bounded contingency tables," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 62(4), pages 785-805, August.
    4. Mitsunori Ogawa & Hisayuki Hara & Akimichi Takemura, 2013. "Graver basis for an undirected graph and its application to testing the beta model of random graphs," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 65(1), pages 191-212, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth Gross & Sonja Petrović & Despina Stasi, 2017. "Goodness of fit for log-linear network models: dynamic Markov bases using hypergraphs," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 69(3), pages 673-704, June.
    2. Kim, Sung-Ho & Choi, Hyemi & Lee, Sangjin, 2009. "Estimate-based goodness-of-fit test for large sparse multinomial distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1122-1131, February.
    3. Fabio Rapallo, 2005. "Algebraic exact inference for rater agreement models," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 14(1), pages 45-66, February.
    4. Fabio Rapallo, 2007. "Toric statistical models: parametric and binomial representations," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 59(4), pages 727-740, December.
    5. George Fishman, 2014. "Counting subsets of contingency tables," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 159-187, February.
    6. Krampe, Anne & Kuhnt, Sonja, 2007. "Bowker's test for symmetry and modifications within the algebraic framework," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 4124-4142, May.
    7. Fabio Rapallo, 2022. "Analysis of the Weighted Kappa and Its Maximum with Markov Moves," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(4), pages 1270-1289, December.
    8. Fabio Rapallo & Maria Piera Rogantin, 2007. "Markov chains on the reference set of contingency tables with upper bounds," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(1), pages 35-51.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:44:y:2017:i:2:p:285-306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0303-6898 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.