IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/sajeco/v93y2025i3p325-354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tracking Progress Towards Gender Equity in the South African Academic Economics Pipeline

Author

Listed:
  • Nicola Branson
  • Emma Whitelaw

Abstract

What are the gender gaps among economics students and staff in public higher education in South Africa? We show that women now represent the majority of enrolments and graduates at most qualification levels, but remain under‐represented in PhD programmes, senior academic ranks and in research outputs. Promisingly, however, the gap in the share of male versus female professorships has been declining over time and is increasingly explained by covariates observed in our data. Moreover, current dynamics suggest that gender parity within academic ranks could be within reach over the next two decades. This should not, however, put advancing women in the academic economics pipeline off the agenda, but rather focus efforts where gaps remain prominent. For example, when disaggregating the professorship gap by race, stark inequalities remain: Although there has been a decline in the share of White males in the system, those remaining are retaining their professorship advantage over and above what their observed characteristics would predict.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicola Branson & Emma Whitelaw, 2025. "Tracking Progress Towards Gender Equity in the South African Academic Economics Pipeline," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 93(3), pages 325-354, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:sajeco:v:93:y:2025:i:3:p:325-354
    DOI: 10.1111/saje.70000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/saje.70000
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/saje.70000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:sajeco:v:93:y:2025:i:3:p:325-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.