IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rmgtin/v29y2026i1p44-63.html

Corporate opacity and net premiums written flows: Evidence from US property‐liability insurers

Author

Listed:
  • Gene Lai
  • Zifen Zeng

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between corporate opacity and policyholders' purchasing behavior in US property‐liability insurers. We find that policyholders are more willing to purchase policies from less opaque insurers. In addition, the financial tail risk exacerbates the negative relationship between opacity and insurance purchasing behavior. The evidence shows that opacity significantly affects purchasing behavior in commercial lines but not in personal lines, suggesting that commercial buyers/risk managers and their brokers help prospective policyholders evaluate insurers' financial strength, stability, and claims‐paying efficiency, thereby reducing information asymmetry. The evidence also shows that opacity does not significantly influence the purchasing behavior in personal automobile and homeowners insurance lines (the most tightly regulated guaranty fund lines). In other words, prospective policyholders of guaranty fund lines may not be incentivized to assess the quality of insurers' financial information.

Suggested Citation

  • Gene Lai & Zifen Zeng, 2026. "Corporate opacity and net premiums written flows: Evidence from US property‐liability insurers," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 29(1), pages 44-63, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:rmgtin:v:29:y:2026:i:1:p:44-63
    DOI: 10.1111/rmir.70031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rmir.70031
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rmir.70031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rmgtin:v:29:y:2026:i:1:p:44-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1098-1616 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.