IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revurb/v27y2015i1p68-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Liberalization And Gender Inequality In The Labor Market: A Theoretical Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ujjaini Mukhopadhyay

Abstract

type="main" xml:lang="en"> The paper seeks to provide a theoretical foundation to the diverse empirical findings with regard to the role of liberalization in perpetuating gender inequality in the labor market. It studies the role of female labor supply decisions on gender wage inequality by considering the interrelation between liberalized policies, gender wage inequality, and female labor force participation. A three–sector Harris-Todaro general equilibrium model has been developed to examine the effects of liberalized trade, investment, and labor market policies on the gender wage gap and female labor force participation. There are two underlying assumptions: first, women are paid less because they are employed in the informal sectors; even within the informal sector, they are engaged in particularly low paying activities because of gender segregation. Second, female labor supply decisions or female labor force participation is endogenous, and depends on male and female wages, and the unemployment of male workers. The comparative static analysis indicates that while a reduction in import tariff may narrow the gender wage gap and raise female workforce participation, foreign capital inflow and labor market deregulation may aggravate gender wage inequality and lower female labor force participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ujjaini Mukhopadhyay, 2015. "Economic Liberalization And Gender Inequality In The Labor Market: A Theoretical Approach," Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 68-87, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revurb:v:27:y:2015:i:1:p:68-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revurb:v:27:y:2015:i:1:p:68-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0917-0553 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.