IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revurb/v18y2006i3p252-263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural Policy As A Social Engineering Tool: A New Jersey Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Edmund M. Tavernier

Abstract

This study uses logistic regression to examine the preferences for social engineering policies in the agricultural sector in a New Jersey case study. It finds that farm operators are unlikely to support a policy allowing countries to restrict trade to pursue domestic economic and social policy goals if the policies affect international trade. In particular, it suggests that farm operators with annual gross sales including government payments between $500 000 and $999 999 are 80 percent less likely to indicate such a preference. Farm operators with advanced degrees, some college education, and a high school diploma are also unlikely to indicate such a preference. In contrast, farm operators who receive no income from farming or ranching and those who receive a percentage of family income from farming or ranching indicate that countries should be allowed to restrict trade to pursue domestic economic and social policy goals even if the policies affect international trade.

Suggested Citation

  • Edmund M. Tavernier, 2006. "Agricultural Policy As A Social Engineering Tool: A New Jersey Case Study," Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 252-263, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revurb:v:18:y:2006:i:3:p:252-263
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-940X.2006.00119.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-940X.2006.00119.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-940X.2006.00119.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revurb:v:18:y:2006:i:3:p:252-263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0917-0553 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.