IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v9y1990i3p433-443.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Obstacles To Seemingly Simple Reform: A Case Study Of Bail Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Edmund F. McGarrell
  • Beverly Rivera
  • James Patton

Abstract

This study involves analysis of the implementation of a new release on recognizance (ROR) policy governing misdemeanor cases in a small, mid‐ western county. The case study is interesting because the policy seems to be characterized by several factors that might lead to predictions of high compliance with policy intent. The findings, however, suggest that consid‐ erable slippage between intent and implementation occurred. It is argued that this slippage is the product of communication problems, the disposition of street‐level implementors, and the failure to include implementors in decision making. These obstacles are then compounded by the lack of performance monitoring. The problems are viewed as interrelated and revolve around the top‐down implementation strategy that failed to involve those responsible for implementation – the street‐level implementors.

Suggested Citation

  • Edmund F. McGarrell & Beverly Rivera & James Patton, 1990. "Obstacles To Seemingly Simple Reform: A Case Study Of Bail Reform," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 9(3), pages 433-443, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:9:y:1990:i:3:p:433-443
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1990.tb01053.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1990.tb01053.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1990.tb01053.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:9:y:1990:i:3:p:433-443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.