IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v8y1988i2p300-321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Synthesizing Politics, Rationality And Advocacy: Energy Policy Analysis For Minority Groups

Author

Listed:
  • J.A. Throgmorton

Abstract

This paper explores the interaction between three primary activities (political influence, scientific analysis, and advocacy) in the practice of policy analysis. After arguing that successful practice depends on the ability of policy analysts to synthesize those three activities, the paper describes and critiques one analytical team's recent efforts to define the impacts of federal energy policy and programs on minority groups. It reports that the analytical team failed to maintain critical distance from its client and to communicate effectively with its lay constituency; acting as a “client advocate,” the team unintentionally but systematically distorted knowledge concerning minorities and energy. The paper concludes by urging analysts to recognize that they have three distinct audiences (clients, technical peers, and lay constituencies) and that successful analysis depends on communicating honestly and openly with each of them.

Suggested Citation

  • J.A. Throgmorton, 1988. "Synthesizing Politics, Rationality And Advocacy: Energy Policy Analysis For Minority Groups," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 8(2), pages 300-321, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:8:y:1988:i:2:p:300-321
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1988.tb01103.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1988.tb01103.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1988.tb01103.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francesca Scala & Stephanie Paterson, 2017. "Bureaucratic Role Perceptions and Gender Mainstreaming in Canada," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 579-593, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:8:y:1988:i:2:p:300-321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.