IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v7y1988i3p641-659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking American Jail Death Rates: A Comparison Of National Mortality And Jail Mortality, 1978, 1983

Author

Listed:
  • L. Thomas Winfree

Abstract

This article provides insights in to the problem of jail deaths in America by drawing upon relevant data from the 1978 and 1983 National Jail Censuses and other official sources. The goal o f the research is to compare national death trends with jail death trends in order to determine (1) if the problem is as grave as the available literature suggests, and (2) if any major changes have occurred as a result of federal court activism. Indeed, we found that when an adjusted general population death rate is employed certain cause‐specific rates are actually lower in jail. This generalization, while true for natural causes and homicides, was not the case for suicides. Depending upon which general population rates are compared with which jail rates, inmates committed suicide at a rate that was between five and fifteen times higher than the rate for free‐world citizens. Between censuses, the general trend in jail death rates was generally downward, although once again suicide rates tended to exhibit less of a decrease than the rates for homicides and death by natural causes. Possible explanations for this anomaly and policy implications are addressed in the article.

Suggested Citation

  • L. Thomas Winfree, 1988. "Rethinking American Jail Death Rates: A Comparison Of National Mortality And Jail Mortality, 1978, 1983," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 7(3), pages 641-659, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:7:y:1988:i:3:p:641-659
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1988.tb00860.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1988.tb00860.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1988.tb00860.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:7:y:1988:i:3:p:641-659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.