IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v6y1987i4p733-743.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Welfare To Work Programs: Lessons On Recent State Initiatives

Author

Listed:
  • Judith M. Gueron

Abstract

Since the federally supported public assistance program became law in 1935, many developments have challenged our perceptions about the employability of welfare mothers and the appropriate design of the AFDC program. A consensus has been building that the AFDC program should be redesigned with the view that employable women and men have a responsibility to work and support their families. The result has been proposals stressing some form of work requirement. Several years ago, the Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation (MDRC) began a five‐year social experiment examining current state efforts to restructure the relationship between welfare and work. The MDRC demonstration addresses four questions. First, is it feasible to impose work‐related obligations as a condition of reviewing welfare? Second, what do workfare‐type programs look like in practice and how do welfare recipients themselves judge the fairness of mandatory requirements? Third, do these initiatives make a difference? Fourth, how do program benefits compare to costs? Issues, findings, and conclusions are related to these questions.

Suggested Citation

  • Judith M. Gueron, 1987. "Welfare To Work Programs: Lessons On Recent State Initiatives," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 6(4), pages 733-743, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:6:y:1987:i:4:p:733-743
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1987.tb00827.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1987.tb00827.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1987.tb00827.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:6:y:1987:i:4:p:733-743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.