IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v6y1986i2p321-329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Intergovernmental Coordination In Coastal Zone Management

Author

Listed:
  • Kem Lowry
  • Tim Eichenberg

Abstract

One of the primary incentives to state governments to participate in the national coastal zone management program is the legal requirement that federal resources use activities as well as federal projects and federally permitted activities that affect state ocean and coastal areas must be consistent with federally‐approved state coastal programs. The “consistency provisions” are among the most innovative attempts to insure intergovernmental coordination in resource management. In assessing the implementation of the consistency provisions, we find that this legal requirement has led to the development of a variety of formal and informal collaborative mechanisms for intergovernmental coordination in ocean and coastal management. While these mechanisms have led to the resolution of the vast majority of federal‐state conflicts in coastal areas some important federal‐state conflicts have not been resolved. This has more to do with the character of these particular conflicts than the general effectiveness of the mechanisms for collaboration that have been established.

Suggested Citation

  • Kem Lowry & Tim Eichenberg, 1986. "Assessing Intergovernmental Coordination In Coastal Zone Management," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 6(2), pages 321-329, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:6:y:1986:i:2:p:321-329
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1986.tb00698.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1986.tb00698.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1986.tb00698.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:6:y:1986:i:2:p:321-329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.