IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v5y1986i4p800-814.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparable Worth In State Government; Trends And Issues

Author

Listed:
  • Keon S. Chi

Abstract

Comparable worth continues to be a controversial issue both in the private and public sector, but particularly in state government. Between 1981 and 1985, a t least 38 states entertained the comparable worth issue at some level. Based on three surveys conducted in 1984 and 1985, this study found that the extent o f states' comparable worth activities, when measured by the introduction of comparable worth bills, tends to vary depending upon the states' geographical location, party line‐ups in the legislatures, unionization of state employees, and the states' votes on the Equal Rights Amendment. The study also identifies a few issues in implementing comparable worth in state government–such as job evaluation, and costs of comparable worth.

Suggested Citation

  • Keon S. Chi, 1986. "Comparable Worth In State Government; Trends And Issues," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 5(4), pages 800-814, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:5:y:1986:i:4:p:800-814
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1986.tb00529.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1986.tb00529.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1986.tb00529.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:5:y:1986:i:4:p:800-814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.