IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v4y1985i4p613-625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Suburban Movement To Limit Growth: Reasons For Support In Orange County

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Baldassare

Abstract

Several studies have shown that suburban residents favor growth controls. It is usually argued that high‐status residents and those living in growing comniunities want limited growth. This paper examines an alternative perspective; support for growth limits broadly found among individuals who perceive community problems. Specific reasons for wanting limited growth, however, vary in importance among different social group. These hypotheses are confirmed by 1,009 Orange County, California residents. Support for growth limits is strongest among those who perceive rapid growth, are dissatisfied with c i t y government, and perceive service problems. Environniental reasoris for wanting limited growth are mentioned most frequently. These concerns are especially noted by the high‐status residents and nonfiscal conservatives. Economic reasons for limited growth are stated by a large minority, and are especially of interest to the lowstatus residents and fiscal conservatives. The results indicate public concerns vary among social groups comprising the citizen support for suburban growth limits. The implications for suburban policy formation and implementation are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Baldassare, 1985. "The Suburban Movement To Limit Growth: Reasons For Support In Orange County," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 4(4), pages 613-625, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:4:y:1985:i:4:p:613-625
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1985.tb00309.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1985.tb00309.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1985.tb00309.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:4:y:1985:i:4:p:613-625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.