IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v43y2026i3ne70099.html

Mapping Transnational Policy Interactions: Evidence From Open Government Policy Documents

Author

Listed:
  • Seulki Lee‐Geiller
  • Mohsan Ali
  • Yannis Charalabidis

Abstract

In today's interconnected world, policymaking increasingly involves cross‐border engagement, as governments draw on external policy models, organizations, and comparative experience. Earlier research has identified important mechanisms of cross‐border policy circulation, but it has been less well suited to capturing more networked, iterative, and discursive forms of engagement. This study argues that such processes are better understood as interaction rather than transaction, through which “epistemic engagement” occurs as policymakers acknowledge and assess external ideas. We therefore treat references to external policy actors as discursive indicators of such engagement. We examine this question in the context of the Open Government Partnership (OGP), a useful setting as it combines peer‐learning and co‐creation with uneven geopolitical influence. Using a mixed‐method design that integrates large language models, network analysis, and qualitative thematic analysis, we analyze four types of open government policy documents from 75 OGP member countries. The findings reveal a complex landscape of contemporary policy interactions, marked by multidirectional flows, expanded actor participation, and context‐sensitive engagement that extends beyond conventional transactional models. Methodologically, the study shows how computation text analysis can trace cross‐national policy engagement at scale while remaining attentive to the interpretive limits of document‐based evidence. 在当今互联互通的世界中,政策制定日益涉及跨境互动,各国政府纷纷借鉴外部政策模式、组织和经验。以往研究已识别出跨境政策流通的重要机制,但难以描述网络化、迭代性和话语性的互动形式。本研究认为,此类过程更应被理解为互动而非交易,政策制定者通过互动来认知和评估外部理念,从而实现“认知互动”。因此,我们将提及外部政策行动者视为此类互动的话语指标。我们以开放政府伙伴关系(OGP)为背景探讨这一问题。OGP是一个理想的研究对象,因为它融合了同伴学习和共同创造以及地缘政治影响力的不均衡性。我们采用混合方法设计,整合了大型语言模型、网络分析和定性主题分析,分析了来自75个OGP成员国的四类开放政府政策文件。研究结果揭示了当代政策互动的复杂格局,其特点是多向流动、行动者参与范围扩大以及超越传统交易模式的、对情境敏感的互动。方法论上,本研究展示了如何运用计算文本分析大规模追踪跨国政策互动,同时兼顾基于文献证据的解释局限性。 En el mundo interconectado de hoy, la formulación de políticas implica cada vez más una interacción transfronteriza, a medida que los gobiernos recurren a modelos de políticas, organizaciones y experiencias comparadas de origen externo. Investigaciones previas han identificado mecanismos importantes de circulación transfronteriza de políticas, pero han resultado menos idóneas para captar formas de interacción más reticulares, iterativas y discursivas. Este estudio sostiene que tales procesos se comprenden mejor como interacción—en lugar de como transacción—, a través de la cual se produce un «compromiso epistémico» en la medida en que los responsables políticos reconocen y evalúan ideas externas. Por consiguiente, consideramos las referencias a actores políticos externos como indicadores discursivos de dicho compromiso. Examinamos esta cuestión en el contexto de la Alianza para el Gobierno Abierto (OGP), un escenario idóneo por cuanto combina el aprendizaje entre pares y la cocreación con una influencia geopolítica asimétrica. Mediante un diseño de métodos mixtos que integra grandes modelos lingüísticos, análisis de redes y análisis temático cualitativo, analizamos cuatro tipos de documentos de política de gobierno abierto procedentes de 75 países miembros de la OGP. Los hallazgos revelan un panorama complejo de interacciones políticas contemporáneas, caracterizado por flujos multidireccionales, una participación ampliada de los actores y un compromiso sensible al contexto que trasciende los modelos transaccionales convencionales. Desde el punto de vista metodológico, el estudio demuestra cómo el análisis computacional de textos permite rastrear el compromiso político transnacional a gran escala, sin dejar de prestar atención a los límites interpretativos de la evidencia documental.

Suggested Citation

  • Seulki Lee‐Geiller & Mohsan Ali & Yannis Charalabidis, 2026. "Mapping Transnational Policy Interactions: Evidence From Open Government Policy Documents," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 43(3), May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:43:y:2026:i:3:n:e70099
    DOI: 10.1111/ropr.70099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.70099
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ropr.70099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:43:y:2026:i:3:n:e70099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.