IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v43y2026i3ne70063.html

Digital Transformation, Administrative Burden, and Citizen–State Interactions: A Case of the Old Age Allowance Policy in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaqi Cao
  • Liang Ma

Abstract

Administrative burdens vary significantly across agencies and communities, and digital government initiatives are proposed as potential solutions to reduce administrative burdens. However, disadvantaged groups, particularly seniors, face multifaceted challenges that digital technologies alone cannot fully resolve. This research, based on in‐depth interviews and grounded theory analyses, examines how frontline bureaucrats, citizens, and digital tools collectively contribute to administrative burdens. We use the case of the Old Age Allowance Policy (OAAP), which was introduced by the Chinese government to address the increasing demands of the rapidly aging population. We develop a theoretical framework conceptualizing administrative burdens as perverse effects of digital transformation, shaped by intricate interactions among citizens' conditions, bureaucratic discretion, and technological limitations. In response to these challenges, our study highlights the crucial role of the government in fostering a supportive environment that enables citizens to adapt effectively to digital transformation. 不同机构和社区的行政负担差异巨大,数字政府举措被认为是减轻行政负担的潜在解决方案。然而,弱势群体(尤其是老年人)面临着多方面的挑战,单靠数字技术无法完全解决。本研究基于深度访谈和扎根理论分析,探讨了一线 人员、公民和数字工具如何共同加剧行政负担。我们以中国政府为应对快速老龄化人口日益增长的需求而推出的养老保险政策为例,将行政负担理解为为政府在进行数字化转型的过程中可能造成的负面效应,其形成机制包括公民自身条件、 街头官僚的自由裁量权和技术限制之间的复杂相互作用。为了应对这些挑战,我们强调了政府在营造支持性环境、使公民能够有效适应数字化转型方面的关键作用。 Las cargas administrativas varían significativamente entre agencias y comunidades, y las iniciativas de gobierno digital se proponen como posibles soluciones para reducirlas. Sin embargo, los grupos desfavorecidos, en particular las personas mayores, enfrentan desafíos multifacéticos que las tecnologías digitales por sí solas no pueden resolver por completo. Esta investigación, basada en entrevistas en profundidad y análisis de teoría fundamentada, examina cómo los burócratas de primera línea, los ciudadanos y las herramientas digitales contribuyen colectivamente a las cargas administrativas. Utilizamos el caso de la Política de Subsidios para la Vejez (OAAP), implementada por el gobierno chino para abordar las crecientes demandas de una población que envejece rápidamente. Desarrollamos un marco teórico que conceptualiza las cargas administrativas como efectos perversos de la transformación digital, moldeados por intrincadas interacciones entre las condiciones de los ciudadanos, la discreción burocrática y las limitaciones tecnológicas. En respuesta a estos desafíos, nuestro estudio destaca el papel crucial del gobierno en el fomento de un entorno propicio que permita a los ciudadanos adaptarse eficazmente a la transformación digital.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaqi Cao & Liang Ma, 2026. "Digital Transformation, Administrative Burden, and Citizen–State Interactions: A Case of the Old Age Allowance Policy in China," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 43(3), May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:43:y:2026:i:3:n:e70063
    DOI: 10.1111/ropr.70063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.70063
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ropr.70063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:43:y:2026:i:3:n:e70063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.