IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v43y2026i2ne70091.html

Is Market a Hero or Villain? A Narrative Policy Framework Analysis of China's Patient‐Centred Healthcare Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Jingqing Yang

Abstract

This study applies the Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) within a non‐democratic context, exploring the role of policy narratives in the implementation of patient‐centred healthcare policy in China. Drawing on a dataset of academic journal articles that reference both “market” and “patient‐centredness,” the research reveals how local implementers reframed national policy by aligning it with operative ideology. While national policy promoted socialist altruism, local actors often reinterpreted it through a market‐oriented perspective to address institutional constraints and financial pressures. Through the strategic use of narrative elements such as heroes and villains, these grassroots narratives subtly shifted the policy's intent without overtly challenging central authority and implemented the policy symbolically on the ground. The study contributes to the scholarship of Chinese health reform by examining the interpretation of national health policy from the implementer's perspective, and to the NPF scholarship by extending its applicability to authoritarian settings and by focusing on the understudied implementation phase of the policy process. 本研究将叙事政策框架(NPF)应用于非民主背景下,探讨政策叙事在中国以 病人为中心的医疗政策实施中的作用。研究基于一系列提及“市场”和“以患者为中心”的学术期刊文章,揭示了 基层执行者如何通过使其与 实操层面的意识形态相契合来重构国家政策。尽管国家政策倡导社会主义 的利他主义,但基层执行者往往从市场导向的角度重新诠释该政策,以应对制度制约和财政压力。通过策略性地运用英雄和反派等叙事要素,这些基层叙事在不公开挑战中央权威的前提下,巧妙地 改变了政策意图,并在基层层面 象征性地实施政策。本研究从执行者的视角考察了国家卫生政策的解读,从而丰富了中国医疗改革的研究;同时,本研究拓展了NPF在威权体制下的适用性,并聚焦于 鲜有研究的政策 的实施阶段, 进一步丰富了NPF的研究成果。 Este estudio aplica el Marco Narrativo de Políticas (MNP) en un contexto no democrático, explorando el papel de las narrativas políticas en la implementación de políticas sanitarias centradas en el paciente en China. Basándose en un conjunto de datos de artículos de revistas académicas que hacen referencia tanto al “mercado” como al “centrismo en el paciente”, la investigación revela cómo los implementadores locales reformularon la política nacional alineándola con la ideología operativa. Si bien la política nacional promovía el altruismo socialista, los actores locales a menudo la reinterpretaban desde una perspectiva orientada al mercado para abordar las limitaciones institucionales y las presiones financieras. Mediante el uso estratégico de elementos narrativos como héroes y villanos, estas narrativas de base modificaron sutilmente la intención de la política sin desafiar abiertamente la autoridad central, implementándola simbólicamente sobre el terreno. El estudio contribuye al estudio de la reforma sanitaria china al examinar la interpretación de la política sanitaria nacional desde la perspectiva del implementador, y al estudio del MNP al ampliar su aplicabilidad a entornos autoritarios y centrarse en la fase de implementación del proceso de políticas, poco estudiada.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingqing Yang, 2026. "Is Market a Hero or Villain? A Narrative Policy Framework Analysis of China's Patient‐Centred Healthcare Policy," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 43(2), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:43:y:2026:i:2:n:e70091
    DOI: 10.1111/ropr.70091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.70091
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ropr.70091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:43:y:2026:i:2:n:e70091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.