IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v43y2026i1ne70023.html

Explaining the Variance of City Response to the COVID‐19 Pandemic in China: A Matter of Leadership?

Author

Listed:
  • Xinming Chen
  • Yihong Liu

Abstract

When COVID‐19 emerged in China, local leaders reacted differently to the health threat. Some acted immediately, some waited for higher levels of authority to act. The timing of local decision‐makers mattered: quick interventions limited the damage wrought by the virus. In this paper, we ask why some local leaders acted quicker than others. We study whether the administrative experience of Chinese leaders affected the timing of initial crisis decision‐making. Drawing on extant literature, we identify three types of administrative experience that might affect the timing of crisis decisions at the local level: personal experience with previous crises, job diversity, and the presence of a local network. Our analysis demonstrates that all three factors are positively associated with the timing of early action in the face of the COVID‐19 epidemic. It appears that experienced leaders are wont to act quicker in the face of an emerging threat.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinming Chen & Yihong Liu, 2026. "Explaining the Variance of City Response to the COVID‐19 Pandemic in China: A Matter of Leadership?," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 43(1), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:43:y:2026:i:1:n:e70023
    DOI: 10.1111/ropr.70023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.70023
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ropr.70023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:43:y:2026:i:1:n:e70023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.