IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v43y2026i1ne12573.html

Wrestling with multiple accountabilities in times of crisis: Findings from the experiences of Chinese local governments in responding to COVID‐19

Author

Listed:
  • Zimeng Ye
  • Ben Ma
  • Yanwei Li

Abstract

Governments around the world, when faced with a crisis, struggle to manage various legitimate accountability expectations. Our study investigated how Chinese local governments reconcile social and hierarchical accountability in managing COVID‐19. We found that local governments are generally more responsive to hierarchical than social accountability. Moreover, senior officials are highly unlikely to shirk their duties toward hierarchical accountability when a crisis is severe. Furthermore, crisis severity increases local governments' responsiveness to social accountability. Our study has encircled our understanding regarding the management of multiple accountabilities in crisis. Los gobiernos de todo el mundo, cuando se enfrentan a una crisis, luchan por gestionar varias expectativas legítimas de rendición de cuentas. Nuestro estudio investigó cómo los gobiernos locales chinos reconcilian la responsabilidad social y jerárquica en la gestión de COVID‐19. Encontramos que los gobiernos locales son generalmente más sensibles a la rendición de cuentas jerárquica que social. Además, es muy poco probable que los altos funcionarios eludan sus deberes hacia la rendición de cuentas jerárquica cuando una crisis es grave. Además, la gravedad de la crisis aumenta la capacidad de respuesta de los gobiernos locales a la responsabilidad social. Nuestro estudio ha rodeado nuestra comprensión con respecto a la gestión de múltiples responsabilidades en crisis. 世界各国政府在面临危机时都会努力设法完成各种合理的问责期望。我们的研究分析了中国地方政府在管控新冠疫情(COVID‐19)时如何协调社会问责与等级问责。我们发现,地方政府通常会更多地响应等级问责,而不是社会问责。此外,当出现严重危机时,高级官员不太可能逃避其在等级问责方面的职责。此外,危机的严重性提高了地方政府对社会问责的响应度。我们的研究丰富对危机中多重问责管理的理解.

Suggested Citation

  • Zimeng Ye & Ben Ma & Yanwei Li, 2026. "Wrestling with multiple accountabilities in times of crisis: Findings from the experiences of Chinese local governments in responding to COVID‐19," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 43(1), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:43:y:2026:i:1:n:e12573
    DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12573
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ropr.12573?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:43:y:2026:i:1:n:e12573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.