IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v2y1982i2p262-270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Remedies Without Rights? The Legal Basis Of Broad‐Gauge Decrees In Prison Conditions Cases

Author

Listed:
  • Daryl R. Fair

Abstract

This paper examines the legal basis for “broad‐gauge” or “administrative intervention” decrees in the sort of lawsuits which have come to be known as extended impact cases, polycentric disputes, or public law litigation. It concludes that equity provides an adequate basis for such decrees and that the Supreme Court's recent use of a narrower view of judicial equity powers, sometimes called the tailoring principle, is not compelled by precedent. The paper further argues that the Supreme Court appears headed in the direction of using the tailoring principle in prison conditions cases (e.g., Bell v. Wolfish), although some support for a broader view of judicial equity power is found in Hutto v. Finney.

Suggested Citation

  • Daryl R. Fair, 1982. "Remedies Without Rights? The Legal Basis Of Broad‐Gauge Decrees In Prison Conditions Cases," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 2(2), pages 262-270, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:2:y:1982:i:2:p:262-270
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1982.tb00672.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1982.tb00672.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1982.tb00672.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:2:y:1982:i:2:p:262-270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.