IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v23y2006i2p453-472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Rise and Fall of Power Line EMFs: The Anatomy of a Magnetic Controversy

Author

Listed:
  • Jon Palfreman

Abstract

The suggestion that power line electromagnetic fields (EMFs) cause diseases like cancer has generated dozens of popular articles and television news segments, hundreds of scientific studies, and numerous consensus reports; it has attracted the attention of epidemiologists, biologists, physicists, policymakers and lawyers. This article will examine the evolution of this controversy through a detailed analysis of the arguments that have been used for and against the hypothesis that power line EMFs have adverse health effects. This article argues that the power line EMF issue provides a classic case study for exploring the challenges citizens, scientists, and policymakers face in sorting out a complex science‐based controversy. This story not only brings together many different perspectives and—from popular notions of cancer clusters to complex epidemiological arguments, from to state‐of‐the‐art animal studies to policy instruments such as the precautionary principle—but also reveals the manner in which a heated controversy can be effectively resolved over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Jon Palfreman, 2006. "The Rise and Fall of Power Line EMFs: The Anatomy of a Magnetic Controversy," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 23(2), pages 453-472, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:23:y:2006:i:2:p:453-472
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00210.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00210.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00210.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:23:y:2006:i:2:p:453-472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.