IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v22y2005i5p599-623.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

United States Public Response to Terrorism: Fault Lines or Bedrock?1

Author

Listed:
  • Hank C. Jenkins‐Smith
  • Kerry G. Herron

Abstract

We test traditional assumptions about the volatility of mass opinion in times of national crises using data about views of terrorism from national surveys of the United States general public in 1995 and 1997, findings from a national survey immediately following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 (9/11), and panel data from a follow‐up survey in 2002. We compare public assessments of the threat of terrorism, willingness to restrict speech to prevent terrorism, support for employing conventional military force against countries that support terrorism, and levels of certainty about culpability required prior to using military force. Results show stable and measured public views prior to 9/11, immediately following the events of that date, and in the subsequent year. Our findings support democratic and modernist theories of public capacities while challenging long‐standing traditional precepts about widespread volatility of mass public opinion.

Suggested Citation

  • Hank C. Jenkins‐Smith & Kerry G. Herron, 2005. "United States Public Response to Terrorism: Fault Lines or Bedrock?1," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 22(5), pages 599-623, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:22:y:2005:i:5:p:599-623
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2005.00163.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2005.00163.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2005.00163.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tom Tyler & David Markell, 2010. "The Public Regulation of Land‐Use Decisions: Criteria for Evaluating Alternative Procedures," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), pages 538-573, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:22:y:2005:i:5:p:599-623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.