IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v21y2004i2p233-252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enron, a Perceived Crisis in Public Confidence, and the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002

Author

Listed:
  • Allan J. Cigler

Abstract

In the spring of 2002 Congress passed and President Bush signed the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), the first major piece of campaign reform legislation since the early 1970s. While momentum for reform had been growing since the mid‐1990s, without the Enron scandal and its potential threat to public officials, additional support to overcome the procedural barriers and opposition from the Republican leadership in both the House and Senate would have been difficult to overcome. In addition, Bush Administration ties to Enron had the effect of demobilizing the president on the issue, making it virtually impossible for him to veto a bill he fundamentally opposed. The Enron scandal provided the “window of opportunity” needed by reform‐oriented elites to pass a controversial and far‐ranging law that was not a high priority on the public's agenda. The end result is a law, pending a Supreme Court ruling on its constitutionality, that has the potential to alter fundamentally how electoral campaigns are funded and conducted.

Suggested Citation

  • Allan J. Cigler, 2004. "Enron, a Perceived Crisis in Public Confidence, and the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 21(2), pages 233-252, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:21:y:2004:i:2:p:233-252
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00071.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00071.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00071.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:21:y:2004:i:2:p:233-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.