IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v19y2002i1p204-237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

WELFARE REFORM: Recent Policy and Politics

Author

Listed:
  • Lawrence M. Mead

Abstract

Public policy research has not combined policy and political analysis as its pioneers imagined. Mostly, political scientists study just the policy process, abandoning prescriptions to policy specialists. A better approach is to combine policy and political analysis, using positions on issues to assess policymaking, and vice versa. This article illustrates that approach by applying it to recent welfare reform. I take raising work levels as the chief goal of reform and assess the Family Support Act (FSA) of 1988 and the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) of 1996 against it. FSA was a timid compromise that achieved little while PRWORA was a conflicted measure that achieved more, but at unnecessary risk. I also ask how the tensions between best policy and politics might be resolved. This approach makes public policy research more relevant to the real stakes in policymaking. [142 words.]

Suggested Citation

  • Lawrence M. Mead, 2002. "WELFARE REFORM: Recent Policy and Politics," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 19(1), pages 204-237, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:19:y:2002:i:1:p:204-237
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2002.tb00235.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2002.tb00235.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2002.tb00235.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:19:y:2002:i:1:p:204-237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.