IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v18y2001i2p122-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring The War On Drugs: A Cybernetic Model For Analyzing The Relationships Between Drug Severity, Drug Salience And Drug Funding

Author

Listed:
  • Richard D. White

Abstract

This study explores the rationality of drug policy. It proposes a cybernetic relationship between actual drug severity, public salience of the drug problem, and anti‐drug funding. The study hypothesizes that increases in the severity of the drug problem will cause an increase in the salience of the drug issue. Increased salience in turn leads to political pressure and increased drug funding. As funding increases, anti‐drug programs become more robust and effective and drug severity decreases. When severity decreases, salience should in turn decrease. And so on. To test the cybernetic model, the study correlates trends of drug data from 1970 through 1996. It finds significant correlation between drug severity, measured by hospital emergency room drug episodes, and drug salience, measured by media coverage of drug events. The study finds correlations of drug funding and severity to be ambiguous, and finds no correlation between drug funding and drug salience. The findings do not support the overall hypothesis of a rational, cybernetic process but offer insights on drug policy dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard D. White, 2001. "Measuring The War On Drugs: A Cybernetic Model For Analyzing The Relationships Between Drug Severity, Drug Salience And Drug Funding," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 18(2), pages 122-149, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:18:y:2001:i:2:p:122-149
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2001.tb00188.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2001.tb00188.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2001.tb00188.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:18:y:2001:i:2:p:122-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.