IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v17y2000i4p1-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Health Care Financial Crisis: Reorganization And Evidence‐Based Medicine As A Response To An “Unholy Trinity”

Author

Listed:
  • Cal Clark
  • Rene McEldowney

Abstract

The key issues of the health care system are often conceptualized as involving three basic dimensions: 1) the quality of health care provided, 2) access to the health care system, and 3) the cost of health care. Following two decades of rapidly escalating health costs throughout advanced industrial societies, the relationships among these three dimensions now constitute what has been called an “unholy trinity” in that improvements along one dimension will almost inevitably provoke problems in terms of one or both of the others. This symposium examines two distinct types of reform that have been developed in response to the crisis in health care costs. The first focuses upon attempts to reorganize existing institutions in order to make them more effective and cost‐efficient. The second considers the move toward “evidence‐based medicine,” that is, more critically evaluating health care outcomes to make sure that treatments are effective and cost‐efficient.

Suggested Citation

  • Cal Clark & Rene McEldowney, 2000. "The Health Care Financial Crisis: Reorganization And Evidence‐Based Medicine As A Response To An “Unholy Trinity”," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 17(4), pages 1-6, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:17:y:2000:i:4:p:1-6
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2000.tb00953.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2000.tb00953.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2000.tb00953.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:17:y:2000:i:4:p:1-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.