IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v16y1999i3-4p11-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Contingency Framework For Environmental Decision‐Making:

Author

Listed:
  • Diane E. Yoder

Abstract

This article explores a contingency framework for environmental decisionmaking. This framework suggests when environmental decision‐makers will use certain decision‐making processes by arguing that the process used is contingent on the type of environmental problem confronted and the attributes of the decision being made. I examine environmental decision‐making from two points. First, in the policy and organizational behavior literatures, a shortage of decision typologies exists. Thus, the article suggests a general typology of decision‐making based on dichotomized categories, e.g., short‐term versus long‐term decisions, decisions made under certainty versus uncertainty, new versus redressed decisions. Second, I suggest a general classification of environmental problems and describe their characteristics. The two typologies are superimposed and predictions made for when certain decision processes will be used. By categorizing decision types and process conditions, one can suggest what processes best suit which decisions and offer suggestions for improving policy outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Diane E. Yoder, 1999. "A Contingency Framework For Environmental Decision‐Making:," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 16(3‐4), pages 11-35, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:16:y:1999:i:3-4:p:11-35
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1999.tb00877.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1999.tb00877.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1999.tb00877.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:16:y:1999:i:3-4:p:11-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.