IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v15y1998i2-3p101-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Decision Frames In Nafta Intranational Conflicts

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Ley‐Borras

Abstract

The regular commercial trade among North American countries involves many issues. To foster free trade, NAFTA provides a legal and political framework for resolving commercial conflicts among its three signatory countries. However, there are also intranational conflicts among the economic actors in each country. Within a given country, participants in a NAFTA deal include individual firms or groups of firms, industry representatives, national commerce officials, state political leaders, and national political leaders, among others. Differences in decision frames and actor objectives can lead to controversy in many NAFTA deals. This article suggests making explicit the decision frame of each actor, or category of actors, and using a unified decision frame for obtaining national agreements on particular NAFTA‐related issues. Unified decision frames should include a common time frame and shared objectives, alternatives and information. This approach can promote agreement on the scope of a trade issue, help identify additional opportunities, reduce actors = uncertainties, clarify prefernces, and promote trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Ley‐Borras, 1998. "Using Decision Frames In Nafta Intranational Conflicts," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 15(2‐3), pages 101-115, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:15:y:1998:i:2-3:p:101-115
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1998.tb00781.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1998.tb00781.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1998.tb00781.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:15:y:1998:i:2-3:p:101-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.